Has biology disproved free will and moral responsibility?
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Free Will and Moral Responsibility in Islamic Philosophy
According to a common view among Muslim philosophers, a moral agent has free will if and only if she is able to do an action when she wants to and is able to avoid it when she wants otherwise. Implicit in this view is the Principle of Alternative Possibilities (PAP). On the other hand, according to this view, free will is dependent on requirements such as conception, judgement, tendency, decisi...
متن کاملHuman Freedom and Moral Responsibility In The Light of Theistic Beliefs
Theistic and atheistic beliefs respectively play a fundamental role in the definition of man's free will and moral responsibility, so far as they can determine the nature, quality, and quantity of human's freedom. After believing in God, the belief in a revealed or a non-revealed religion and the manner in which God’s attributes are interpreted play an essential role in the definition of free w...
متن کاملMoral psychology, vol. 4: free will and moral responsibility.
ISSN: 1354-6805 (Print) 1464-0619 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/pcnp20 Moral psychology, vol. 4: free will and moral responsibility David E.J. Linden To cite this article: David E.J. Linden (2015) Moral psychology, vol. 4: free will and moral responsibility, Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 20:5, 469-472, DOI: 10.1080/13546805.2015.1073470 To link to this article: http://d...
متن کاملConsciousness, free will, and moral responsibility: Taking the folk seriously
In this paper, I offer evidence that folk views of free will and moral responsibility accord a central place to consciousness. In sections 2 and 3, I contrast action production via conscious states and processes with action in concordance with an agent's long-standing and endorsed motivations, values, and character traits. Results indicate that conscious action production is considered much mor...
متن کاملTraditional and Experimental Approaches to Free Will and Moral Responsibility
claims, and less familiar with what has been said and argued? True, both compatibilist and incompatibilist philosophers have made claims about what ordinary people believe about free will and moral responsibility (for examples, see Nahmias et al. 2006, 29– 30), and such claims are best tested empirically. What is not clear is how much stock philosophers should put in such ordinary beliefs. Acco...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
دوره 107 28 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010